home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: ausnews.austin.ibm.com!usenet
- From: marc.aussems@tip.nl
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: Re: Announce: AWeb 1.0 released!
- Date: 2 Apr 1996 08:43:52 GMT
- Organization: Nothing special
- Message-ID: <4jqpc8$1c8s@ausnews.austin.ibm.com>
- References: <4ivack$5pa@news.xs4all.nl> <4j146q$h1m@kdcol.kdcol.com> <2045.6661T598T940@mt-inc.com> <19960329.7CC9BA8.118C8@mother.com> <4jkb6q$ftn@news1.channel1.com> <4jlm4m$muc@serpens.rhein.de> <4joo02$fom@storm.cycor.ca> <4jp3hc$ail@serpens.rhein.de>
- Reply-To: marc.aussems@tip.nl
- NNTP-Posting-Host: nlre153.benelux.ibm.com
- X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 v1.02
-
- In <4jp3hc$ail@serpens.rhein.de>, mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de (Michael van Elst) writes:
- >dgrant@dgrant.peinet.pe.ca (Dennis Grant) writes:
- >
- >>Comparing NHTML to this is like saying "I won't read that
- >>book because it was typeset on a PC" or "I won't look at that picture because
- >>it was made on a Mac"
- >
- >As a matter of fact I couldn't read a book if I had a Framemaker file or an
- >Adobe PDF file. And I cannot read NHTML either. I don't see a difference.
-
- It's more like those documents make with Word and alikes. People are more
- concerned with the looks (sure I can add a font, line here.... line there...)
- then with the contents.
- In this context I prefer books written in TeX and I use it myself too.
-
- Just my .02
-
- Mars
-
-